🔗 Share this article

Only two days prior to the New York race for mayor, Michael Lange made a bold electoral prediction – not just the winner citywide, and block by block. Lange, an expert in elections born and raised in New York City, devoted more than ten years in progressive politics and emerged as a kind of local celebrity recently for his thorough analyses into municipal statistics and voter surveys.

He published his highly detailed forecast map – which correctly forecast that the progressive candidate was victorious while missing Andrew Cuomo’s solid showing – on his Substack, his platform. Lange possesses a talent for witty coinages. He highlighted, for instance, the split between the progressive stronghold, running from one neighborhood to another area to a third locale, where he predicted (correctly) that the left-wing candidate would win by huge margins, and the conservative-leaning zone on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. In those areas, “the Free Press and Wall Street Journal outrank the New York Times” in readership and the majority of electors favored the independent, who ran as a moderate alternative.

Voting Day Patterns and Surprises

What was your election night?

It was necessary since they were adding around 200,000 ballots into the tally every few minutes! I felt a little nervous initially: The candidate was ahead the initial ballots by a dozen percentage points, but came large groups of votes that came in later and his lead dropped from 12 to 8%. I was worried.

Understand, it was possible where election day turned out kind of poorly for Mamdani, in which Cuomo was going to end up basically doubling his votes from the Democratic primary. But Mamdani added half a million supporters to his primary coalition, and that’s a huge reason why he won. He campaigned and massively expanded his support from the primary.

Expanding Support

Where did Mamdani get those extra votes from?

He built the alliance that progressives always wanted to build: it’s multiracial, youthful, it’s renters and individuals squeezed by affordability. He gained significantly with Black and Hispanic voters, everyday New Yorkers, compared to the primary. Plus he further maximized his base of left-leaning activists, young leftists, and Muslims and south Asians. He couldn’t have won without expanding his appeal.

He created the coalition that the left always wanted to build: multiracial, young, tenants and people struggling with costs

There were also a number of supporters of both candidates – is that a big trend?

It’s definitely a genuine phenomenon, confined to Hispanic laborers, Asian communities and Muslims. Electors in immigrant strongholds that went for the former president previously backed the progressive this year. But I wouldn’t say he was winning over Caucasian laborers and Maga voters.

Voter Participation and Impact

One of the big stories of the election was the sky-high participation. Who did that help?

Both sides. Turnout was much greater than I had expected. I thought it could exceed 2 million, but it reached 2.3M – that is a lot of darn voters. There was a decent opposition group, who were motivated, but his supporters was equally driven, and that was enough to secure victory.

You forecasted he’d get over half the ballots. Is he likely for that?

Currently it appears he’s likely to get over 50%. He’s at just over 50% but there’s still around 200,000 votes left to report at that time. Thus it’s not it’s definitive, but I believe probable, and I hope he does because then no one can say the Republican was a spoiler.

Republican Collapse

The GOP candidate, the Republican candidate, is the other big story. His support plummeted.

He didn’t win any district in any area. Including Tottenville in Staten Island, which is like an 88% Trump neighborhood. That really was unexpected. Cuomo held Caucasian districts, very wealthy areas and very religiously Jewish areas, and plus gained all of these conservatives on the island with a high participation. I believe there was significant strategic balloting by the Republicans. They were doing it before Trump tweeted his support for Cuomo, but it assisted. It could have even turned the tide unless Mamdani’s coalition failed to expand.

The “Commie Corridor”

What about your often-discussed left-wing base – was support for Mamdani overwhelming in those parts of Brooklyn and Queens?

In my view there was a little dilution of the commie corridor in some areas like neighborhoods that have more older white ethnic folks. In Astoria, for example, the Greek landlords and residents supported Cuomo. Thus there was some opposition. But no, mostly the commie corridor is a key factor why Zohran prevailed – he was polling between high percentages in specific neighborhoods.

Jewish Voters

In the lead-up to the election we reported on if the candidate was gaining ground with Jewish New Yorkers. Any indication that he did?

Exist areas with many non-religious and left-inclined voters – such as Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he did well. But in the affluent districts such as the Upper East Side, his position on Israel definitely mattered in those places. Likewise in the moderate communities like Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Bronx areas – they favored the independent. And also, there are newcomers from the former Soviet Union in the borough, who were pretty staunchly supportive. Therefore it’s unclear if there were major surprises here, but he retained more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and even parts of the another locale with large leads.

Long-Term Significance

Has Mamdani rewritten what New York represents in politics? Will the commie corridor become a launch pad for progressive contenders?

Yes, it’s no coincidence that some of the biggest political leaders from the left come from a few areas in the boroughs. I’m sure that we’ll see additional examples – people will come from these neighborhoods to be elevated nationally.

However I think that every city in America can have similar progressive hubs. Urban places are the centers of leftwing power in America – since they’re young, tenancy is common and they represent locales where people are crushed by the disparities we face.