🔗 Share this article

The tobacco company stands accused of “utter hypocrisy” for campaigning against anti-smoking regulations in Africa that are already in place in the UK.

African regulatory opposition

Documents seen by journalists sent from the firm's affiliate in Zambia to the nation's political leaders asks for proposals to prohibit tobacco advertising and sponsorship to be scrapped or postponed.

The tobacco firm seeks changes to a draft bill that include decreasing the proposed size of graphic health warnings on cigarette packaging, the removal of restrictions on scented cigarette varieties, and reduced sanctions for any firms breaking the new laws.

Anti-tobacco campaigner response

“Were I in government, I would say that they permit the protection of the British people and sustain the fatalities of the Zambian people,” stated the health advocate.

More than 7,000 Zambians a year die from tobacco-related illnesses, according to World Health Organization estimates.

Chimbala said the letter was understood to have been copied to several government departments and was in circulation among public interest organizations.

Global industry interference concerns

The situation emerges alongside expanded apprehension about industry interference with health policies. Last month, international health experts sounded an alarm that the smoking product companies was intensifying efforts to dilute worldwide restrictions.

“We see evidence of industry lobbying globally. Corporate signatures are on delayed tax increases in Indonesia, stalled legislation in Zambia and even a compromised resolution at the UN high-level meeting,” said the tobacco industry watchdog.

Likely impacts

“If a tobacco control measure fails to be approved because of this letter, the cost might be borne in individuals' health who might potentially stop smoking.”

The tobacco control bill going through Zambia’s parliament includes proposals to go further UK legislation by extending coverage to e-cigarettes, and mandating that pictorial cautions cover three-quarters of product packaging.

Corporate counter-proposals

Via documentation, the company recommends this be reduced to thirty to fifty percent “within the WHO-FCTC suggested parameters”, postponed for minimum 12 months after the law is enacted.

Global health authorities specifically advises a alert needs to encompass at least half of the cigarette package face “and seek to occupy as much of the main visible surfaces as possible”. Across the United Kingdom, warnings must cover sixty-five percent of a product container sides.

Scented product controversy

The corporation requests the elimination of comprehensive limitations on flavoured tobacco products, suggesting that it would drive users to “black market” products. It suggests banning a limited selection of “flavours based on desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Every scented tobacco product have been prohibited in Britain since 2020.

The pending regulation recommends punishments for different infractions “ranging from a portion of yearly revenue to ten-year jail sentences”.

Company justification

Through correspondence, the company executive of British American Tobacco Zambia states the company is dedicated to ethical business practices” and “backs the goals of governments to reduce smoking incidence and the associated health impact” but maintains that “some regulations can have undesirable and unforeseen outcomes.”

Activist reaction

Chimbala said BAT’s proposed changes would “weaken this legislation so much that the impact needed for it to cause long-term change in society will not be achieved”.

The circumstance that numerous similar measures operated within the UK, where the corporation is based, was “utter hypocrisy itself”, he commented.

“We exist in a connected world. When I cultivate smoking products in my garden and gather the crop and sell it out – and my offspring don't use tobacco, but my neighbour’s children do … to enrich myself and all the generations of my children while my neighbor's family are succumbing … is in itself complete moral failure.”

Public health laws in the Britain or other nations had not caused companies to close, the campaigner stated. “Legislation never shuts down the industry. Measures simply defend the people.”

Standard business position

The company representative commented: “The company operates its activities following with relevant national regulations. Additionally, the firm contributes in the nation's lawmaking procedures in line with the relevant frameworks which provide for stakeholder participation in regulation development.”

The company was “not resisting legislation”, the representative commented, mentioning that underage people should be safeguarded against access to tobacco and nicotine.

“We advocate for progressive regulation to achieve intended population health targets, while accepting the variety of rights and obligations on corporations, customers and associated groups,” the spokesperson stated, noting that the corporation's recommendations “reflect the realities of the Zambian market and tobacco industry, which involves growing volumes of illegal commerce”.

The nation's ministry of economic activities and commercial operations was approached for comment.